Review of "The Case for Copyright Reform" (Week 5)
[source: https://www.eea.europa.eu/legal/copyright]
In
the modern world, copyright is an essential part of the information that is
hovering around the Internet. Some people follow it, but others try to bypass
it by creating a “pirate” copy of the data and releasing it for free on various
websites like “The Pirate Bay”. To further investigate this matter, I will give
some opinions about the ideas that were presented in “The Case for Copyright
Reform” which was written by Rick Falkvinge and Christian Engström.
The
authors introduced 6 main points which summarized their proposals:
§
Moral Rights Unchanged
§
Free Non-Commercial Sharing
§
20 Years of Commercial Monopoly
§
Registration After 5 Years
§
Free Sampling
§
A Ban on DRM
The
first idea suggested that there should be no changes to the understanding of
the real author. People who are responsible for what they have invented or
created have to be known as the original authors. Someone who pretends to be
the actual creator should be punished as it is considered an illegal activity.
I completely agree with this idea, because if someone falsely claims to be the
author then it would be morally deceiving for the real creator. That is why the
originality of the author must be protected at all costs.
By
“free non-commercial sharing” it is meant that there is a freedom of sharing simple
things such as songs, photos with your friends, and so on. I believe that this
action should be allowed as it has no profits involved. Furthermore, sharing
such simple stuff and having restrictions to these actions seems absolutely
absurd. The only reason to have such a law would be acceptable if the action
engages in commercial purposes.
Did you know that copyright lasts for life plus 70 years?
Yes, it is indeed surprising and absurd to hear this. However, the authors
believe that reducing the duration to 20 years from the publication date would
be a great idea both for the investors and the society. I mean obviously, no
investor would really wait life plus 70 years to invest in such works. In
addition to this, it is not possible for a deceased writer to come back to life
and continue his work or create new ones, that is why I support the idea of
reducing the protection duration of copyright.
Registering after 5 years from the publication would be a
helpful step towards the copyrighted works that have an owner who is impossible
to find. Keeping a record of the rights owner is important as later it may be
required to be used in new works.
Free sampling would be big innovation to the music and
film industry. This is something that I would recommend as the new works can be
modified with existing samples. Additionally, free sampling could result in
less work and convenient solutions to various industries.
Lastly, a ban on DRM is something that should be analyzed
deeply. The DRM prevents us from copying, sending copies to everyone, remixing,
and playing it on multiple machines; nevertheless, these are not the only
features of DRM. As harsh it may sound, I believe that DRM getting banned is a
valid idea. For example, DRM caused performance issues in several computers
which some people were not happy with. In the game “Assassin’s Creed: Origins”
DRM would check files before opening the game to make sure no files were
changed
In conclusion, this book includes great suggestions for the future of copyright, and I really recommend the enlisted proposals that may solve ongoing issues that are caused by copyrights.
References
[1] |
R. Edmonds,
"How aggressive DRM in games only hurts the consumer," Windows
Central, [Online]. Available: https://www.windowscentral.com/how-aggressive-drm-games-only-hurts-consumer.
[Accessed 7 February 2022]. |
Comments
Post a Comment